9月9日 星期四 氣溫30°C 濕度66% 預測: 溫度指數為...   詳細天氣


Email 給好友 Email 給好友:   好友名字     好友 Email      
標題: 葡報勁踢爆新中圖比賽黑幕,得獎者竟為崔世平公司職員~
Chenming
New User

UID 91541
帖子 75 / 精華 3
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 344 分
註冊 2008-6-24

狀態 離線
#1
發表於 2008-7-24 14:40  資料 悄悄話 
葡報勁踢爆新中圖比賽黑幕,得獎者竟為崔世平公司職員~



新中圖比賽前,由於文化局堅持不事先公開評審委員之名單,亦堅持“得獎方案將交由更合適人仕深化設計”.社會上已批評比賽不公平.市民更懷疑比賽已有內定人選,坊間流傳內定者即為 塌石廣場設計者 吹 水 平
 
針對這些質疑,文化局長亦多番重申比賽“絕對公平”,“沒有內定人選”.

相關人仕的謊言與黑暗內幕,現在終於毫不留情地被葡報大篇幅踢爆了:第一第二名得獎者均為 崔世平公司 的職員!

根據慣例,為公平起見以及“利益迴避”原則,凡參與政府前期規劃研究的顧問公司,均不得參與後續的設計投標或比賽.因為,顧問公司如果已經參與了前期研究,手中必定掌握大量沒向外公佈的內幕研究規劃資料,而相關的比賽規則也可能委由其協助擬定.如果他們也能參加比賽,對其它參實者而言是極大的不公平.葡報質疑的是,首先,慣例上比賽規則中均會明定前期規劃公司不得參加,而文化局舉辦的這次新中圖比賽卻無規定.第二,崔x平公司暗中參公司職員參加比賽,恐亦違反了“利益迴避”原則.真是黑暗中的黑暗,金玉其外,敗絮其中!

文中出現的關鍵人名
Heidi Ho = 何麗鑽 (文化局局長)
Vong Man Cheng = 黃文靜 (第一第二名得獎者, 崔世平公司 的職員
Jose Chui Sai Peng = 崔世平 (立法會議員,新域工程顧問公司 老細)



小弟不材,時間有限,重點針對文章第一段翻譯如下,大家可以接力翻出剩下的文章:


公平透明在哪裡??
新中圖比賽獲獎者為負責研究的顧問公司的職員!


”新中圖第一第二名獲獎者均為同一人,並被發現為文化局委託負責新中圖規劃研究顧問工作的公司的職員.對此,文化局局長何麗鑽重申比賽一切合法,因為比賽規則並沒有明定該公司人員不得參與比賽.可是,法律專家表示,就行政的透明性與公平性而言,就算比賽規則沒規定,此舉已造成參賽者之間的利益衝突,亦使該公司(崔世平的公司)由於掌握了相關內部資訊的“特權”下,造成比賽的不公平.而澳門建築師協會已對此事展開了解.”

The two first places of the competition of ideas for the new Central Library of Macau had been deliver to one arquitecta that it works for the company who was puts in charge for the Cultural Institute to make the study on the planning of the construction of the structure. The regulation did not hinder the candidacy and Heidi Ho reiterates the imparcialidade of the process. However, the transparency of the Administration if does not limit to the letter of the law and must have in account an eventual conflict of interests and privileged access to the information, understands the jurists. The Association of the Arquitectos already is to follow the case.

葡文原文詳:http://forum.cyberctm.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=210891&extra=page%3D1





YAHOO 翻譯 (來自1940網友)
Arquitecta that competition for Central Library won works in company who gave consultadoria to the IC

Where the transparency lies

The two first places of the competition of ideas for the new Central Library of Macau had been deliver to one arquitecta that it works for the company who was puts in charge for the Cultural Institute to make the study on the planning of the construction of the structure. The regulation did not hinder the candidacy and Heidi Ho reiterates the imparcialidade of the process. However, the transparency of the Administration if does not limit to the letter of the law and must have in account an eventual conflict of interests and privileged access to the information, understands the jurists. The Association of the Arquitectos already is to follow the case.

Sónia Nunes

Arquitecta Vong Man Cheng, that was in first and as place in the competition of ideas for the future Central Library of Macau, works for the same company that the Cultural Institute contracted, in 2006, to make the study on the planning of the construction – the CAA, Planning and Engineering, Consultants Limited who are managed by the member of the house of representatives Jose Chui Sai Peng.

Vong affirms that the superior did not inform “ ” in as the competition went to submit two proposals and guarantees that he did not have knowledge of the rendering of services signed between the company and the Administration. Heidi Ho is shielded in the regulation, the existence of an international jury, and is remained firm in the speech of the transparency.
In principle, in legal terms, it will not have had imperfections: but the employees of the IC were hindered to participate in the competition. Another reference of exclusion does not have any; nothing – during the phase of competition - on the forwarding of the secretary for the Social Subjects and Culture was said who, the 12 of July, subdelegou in the president of IC “ or in its legal substitute, all them to be able necessary to represent Special the Administrative Region of Macau, as grantor, in the contract of rendering of services of ‘ studies on the planning of the construction of the new installations of the Central Library ’, to celebrate with the company CAA, Planning and Engineering, Consultants Limited ”. However, to make jus to the imparcialidade proclaimed for Heidi Ho, the organization it had, in abstracto, to have prevented eventual suspicion on candidates with privileged access to the information and possible conflicts of interest. That is, the consultadoria company, understands a jurist Today contact for the Macau, “ must have been cited in the exclusions. Exactly that it does not have legal impediments, has a moral question. The beginning of the legality of the Administration it is not only not to make what the law forbids. It is to make everything so that before the public opinion they do not remain doubts on its imparcialidade ”.
Already the president of the IC anchors itself in what always she said since that in March opened the competition of conceptual drawing: “ We have a regulation. Well the arquitectos are come to participate in this competition all since that they are enrolled in the DSSOPT. What we intend we are to give to chance to all the arquitectos to participate in this great event of construction of the Central Library ”, reiterated. Heidi Ho repeated that it was from the list supplied for the direcção of the Public works and Transports that had been you deliver invitations to the arquitectos and advanced: “ we cannot know all the personal datas of the candidates ”. However, one of demanded documents as requisite of candidacy was the presentation of the curriculum vitae of arquitecto the competition. “ the resumes had been appreciated but this situation was not verified ”, excepted the president. Today the Macau asked for to the DSSOPT to have access to the register of Vong Man Cheng what it was declined, a time that arquitecta asked for that the data were confidential.
The company of Chui Sai Peng was in charge for the Government to planear the construction of the new Central Library and to study the renewal of all the public net librarian of Macau. In October of 2006, the member of the house of representatives presented a preliminary report where if he said, for example, that the future library must have private areas to the families, Internet without wires, access the public transports, rooms to function 24 hours per day and advanced for a square shaped structure. After successive questions on that study of the CAA if it reported the Macau Today, Heidi Ho affirmed: “ was divulged a report of 50 pages the one that all the population had access ”. The president of the IC did not comment directamente on the eventual conflict of interests of arquitecta that she transited for second phase of the competition. E, a time more, daqui did not leave: “ Since that all congregated the requirements the arquitectos could participate. The jury is international, arquitecto of Macau does not have any relation with none, and made an evaluation with justice, severity and imparcialidade. Everything was divulged. The process is transparent and just ”, underlined.

Word of arquitecta

The winner of the first phase of the competition for the Central Library – contactada by our periodical through the CAA - Vong Man Cheng relates that the existence of any conflict of interests is unaware of, guarantees that it did not have access the data you add and argues that only it was limited to follow the rules stipulated for the IC. “ I did not inform my superior on my candidacy to this competition; I understood that it was not necessary. The two proposals had been made outside of my working hours and my superior does not have knowledge of them. Wise person who the CAA had been contracted for this service because it was does not deliver to another department ”, clarified.
Vong Man Cheng affirmed despite he was “ surprised ” with the result of the competition, assumes full “ confidence ” in the two works who presented and detaches the contribution with arquitectos “ friends ” of Hong Kong: “ Basically, I were put in charge of the part on the ideas or concepts and they had offered to me to support technician ”. E advances: “ the process of conception of these two proposals resulted of a good interchange enters the arquitectos of Hong Kong and Macau ”. Vong opposed, however, to say how many “ friends ” are of the RAEM “ had cooperated ” in the elaboration of the drawings. As well as also if it did not show available to say has how much time works in the CAA. Also he does not have knowledge if other colleagues of the company had delivered proposals for the competition launched for the IC.
Arquitecta relates that the Organization not yet informed on the prémios of 200 a thousand patacas (for the first place) and of 120 a thousand patacas (for as) the one to it that has right since the passed monday.

To the woman of Cesar

The jurist contactado for our periodical relates that she is necessary to analyze the contract signed between the CAA and the IC, to compare the study of consultadoria with the notebook of incubencies stipulated in the regulation and to disclose the rules of the competition to select the law substance. However, despite, for hypothesis, the contract has been already rescinded “ has good-sense rules that the Administration must fulfill. If, eventually, a company was contracted to elaborate a previous study – where if she says which the objectivos that the Library must follow – and later, this same company concurs, she will have a conflict of interests, she will have impediment. It will be to be judge in proper cause: it will be to concur for a thing where it was who established the criteria ”.
IC – although to be to follow the regulation – would have, continues, to assume the same position of a judge when it asks for excuse not to judge a familiar one or friend. “ Has a series of transparency rules that exist not in such a way to warn the imparcialidade but to prevent that, in abstracto, the public has any hypothesis to doubt the decision ”, added. The prevention must have been had in account a time that if “ a company was consulted to define the ends of the future library, how many books must have, how many audiences, etc, and concurred, will have more than what a conflict of interests – will have access the privileged information that places it in a situation of favor in relation to the remaining candidates ”, enhances.
The same source detaches that the fact of arquitecta not to have had knowledge of the study made for the CAA does not invalidate the balance. “ the law of the transparency does not intend to guarantee if it had access or not [to the information]. It before intends to assure that if it cannot have access. When impediment rules are created and order of excuse in the relation of the Administration with the citizens is for preventing that somebody can put in cause the exemption. – does not serve to put in cause the honesty of the people in concrete serves to prevent that somebody doubts it ”, excepted. The position of the IC, concludes, must thus have had in dictated account the old one: “ To the woman of Cesar is not enough to be serious, has to seem that it he is ”.
The same jurist observed despite the option of Heidi Ho in dividing the competition for two phases, although to be practical common in everybody, “ can not be the method most transparent of all ”. “ So that they did not remain doubts, the Administration could have done a competition without invitations and where, eventually, to follow to projecto of ideas it had one of execution soon, with costs and stated periods. The ideas are very pretty but they only obtain well to be evaluated will have an associated cost – are to speak of public dinheiros. While citizen this is, for me, the basic question ”, emphasized.
Aquando of the presentation of the results, the president of the IC was sparing in clarifications on the second phase of the competition. But he clarified that the candidates transited who had been in the three first places – in the practical one, two arquitectos – and that he would go to be created a new regulation. The diploma, informed later for official notice to the press, will be made by the Real Institute of Arquitectos Britânicos (RIBA). “ All the regulation, as well as the procedures for the selecção of the winner of the next phase [execution] will be of the responsibility of this institution ”, is read in the note. The organization detaches that the advisory entity “ is of the most important and influential institutions of architecture to the world-wide level ” and has a Cabinet of Competitions that “ operates with the maximum of professionalism and objectividade ”.

Association of the Arquitectos emits opinion soon “ ”

The president of the Association of the Arquitectos, Nuno Jorge, related Today to the Macau that of moment the organism “ does not have commentaries to make ” but it advanced that “ will be made an official notice soon ” - the direcção, clarified, still is to collect information to support an opinion official.
Already Mário Duke, one of the candidates neglected for the jury of the competition, waits that Heidi Ho clarifies the situation. “ the IC has affirmed to pautar itself for practical of exemption, transparency and professionalism that me seem inverse to these occurrences and must be justified public. It is a against-census. If not to come necessity in correcting any thing is because the process had gaps ”, comments.
Arquitecto still raises the possibility to have been evaded taxes information the competitors. The regulation does not relate the consultadoria study, although to describe as the interior space of the library must be organized – it says, among others criteria, that the open bookshelves must have capacity for 400 a thousand books; the reading zone must enclose 700 places (120 for readers of periodic, 150 for children and 430 for adults). It also stipulates that two rooms for new must be created, but does not relate, for example, that the infanto-youthful spaces must be moved away from the zones for adults – the necessity of the separation were one of the points detached for the jury.
The planning for construction of the library, affirms Mário Duke, “ has been worked since 2006, was objecto of a rendering of services. This information is not invoked in the regulation of the competition. Who did not have access to the study had that to make the survey of the situation, when some available data already were ”, it laments. For arquitecto, the rules had sinned for omission: “ If the clause of restrictions – that it has that to see, mainly, with conflicts of interests - it did not foresee this situation is because badly it was made: the reach is exactamente this. On the other hand, the contracts that the Administration generates have, for norm, clauses of secrecy ”, detach.
Arquitecto believes the exemption of the jury. It only admits that “ has conditions favorable to this outcome since the beginning ”. Mário Duke waits that the IC act in “ in the direction of optimum procedure ”, that is, that it has in account “ the principles of protecção of the public interest, the equality and the good-faith ” that they guide the Administrative law. However, it understands, the eventual impugnation of the competition must be determined for the Government: “ For the competitors is indifferent. The important one is that the IC arrive at a conclusion and if reveals ”, enhances.
[ 本帖最後由 Chenming 於 2008-7-24 15:36 編輯 ]


 附件: 您所在的用戶組無法下載或查看附件,請先登入
本帖最近評分記錄
benben   2008-7-24 18:01  積分  +20   好料分享
benben   2008-7-24 18:01  本月流動積分  +10   好料分享
頂部
segseg
Zealous User


UID 57394
帖子 2486 / 精華 3
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 1647 分
註冊 2007-9-17

狀態 離線
#2
發表於 2008-7-24 14:44  資料 文集 悄悄話 
在澳門, e d 係全澳市民都會睇唔過眼ge "平 常 事"

頂部
我係西人
(不甘寂寞)
Zealous User


UID 89049
帖子 1512 / 精華 5
本月流動積分 2 分
總流動積分 3128 分
註冊 2008-6-2

狀態 離線
#3
發表於 2008-7-24 14:48  資料 文集 悄悄話 
九官!:09082:




我係西人  即係洋人  九九歸一  多多包涵
頂部
屎TM
Fresh User

UID 23700
帖子 286 / 精華 0
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 8 分
註冊 2006-10-9

狀態 離線
#4
發表於 2008-7-24 14:49  資料 文集 悄悄話 
荷電鑽做乜咁維護吹屎秤?因為荷電鑽上司係吹屎ON。
頂部
查看用戶的流動空間 蛇哥
Moderator


UID 17992
帖子 35932 / 精華 5
本月流動積分 22 分
總流動積分 3341 分
註冊 2004-8-8
來自 洞穴巷

狀態 離線
#5
發表於 2008-7-24 14:56  資料 V-Space 悄悄話 
以後唔洗招標啦..........晒左我地納d稅




頂部
quota
Zealous User

UID 59582
帖子 1146 / 精華 2
本月流動積分 8 分
總流動積分 285 分
註冊 2007-10-2

狀態 離線
#6
發表於 2008-7-24 15:08  資料 文集 悄悄話 
仲黑暗過神州.....

只好望上天打救了
頂部
egeu
(窮酸秀才)
Zealous User


UID 21785
帖子 3426 / 精華 1
本月流動積分 3 分
總流動積分 1077 分
註冊 2005-11-28
來自 橫大法學院

狀態 在線
#7
發表於 2008-7-24 15:09  資料 文集 悄悄話 
狗始於改不了吃屎的習慣




讀得書多,前景坎坷,懶過隻狗,買車買樓
頂部
澳門阿九
Fresh User

UID 91546
帖子 192 / 精華 0
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 301 分
註冊 2008-6-24

狀態 離線
#8
發表於 2008-7-24 15:30  資料 文集 悄悄話 
回覆 #1 Chenming 的帖子


更讓人質疑的是:為何第一第二名都係同一人???為什麼又這麼巧又是崔生既職員??:09082:

[ 本帖最後由 澳門阿九 於 2008-7-24 15:31 編輯 ]
頂部
福德伯
Zealous User


UID 70943
帖子 4769 / 精華 2
本月流動積分 60 分
總流動積分 3833 分
註冊 2008-1-10

狀態 離線
#9
發表於 2008-7-24 15:35  資料 文集 悄悄話 
狗官,食屎啦:shine:
頂部
查看用戶的流動空間 martial
Senior User


UID 38117
帖子 7583 / 精華 0
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 266 分
註冊 2007-4-10
來自 風雲星

狀態 離線
#10
發表於 2008-7-24 15:42  資料 V-Space 悄悄話 
澳門依家仲衰過大陸,大陸都有溫總理,澳門呢,只有官商勾結




珍惜自己現在所擁有的,不要在失去以後才知道後悔。
頂部
查看用戶的流動空間 rotary7
(*RainBow7*)
直選版主


UID 2091
帖子 23903 / 精華 3
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 832 分
註冊 2004-8-8
來自 *PM ME~PM~YOU*

狀態 離線
#11
發表於 2008-7-24 15:44  資料 V-Space 悄悄話 
fuxking "BLOW" shit
頂部
tonycute
New User

UID 26958
帖子 19 / 精華 0
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 13 分
註冊 2006-11-16

狀態 離線
#12
發表於 2008-7-24 15:50  資料 悄悄話 
作為參賽者的我們........真不知該說甚麼...
但我們不會認輸的
頂部
baggiochan
(巴治奧 ‧ 陳)
V.I.P


UID 37212
帖子 13680 / 精華 0
本月流動積分 32 分
總流動積分 886 分
註冊 2007-3-28
來自 神之領域

狀態 離線
#13
發表於 2008-7-24 15:53  資料 文集 悄悄話 
向呢度嘈有咩用? 想爭取民心的政客快d做野啦, 一於搞大件事佢~
頂部
Syndicate
Zealous User


UID 18201
帖子 3245 / 精華 1
本月流動積分 3 分
總流動積分 597 分
註冊 2004-8-8

狀態 離線
#14
發表於 2008-7-24 15:58  資料 文集 悄悄話 
人地間公司就係多人才
你地d庸才又妒忌
頂部
查看用戶的流動空間 1940
Zealous User


UID 29512
帖子 4591 / 精華 2
本月流動積分 0 分
總流動積分 294 分
註冊 2006-12-7

狀態 離線
#15
發表於 2008-7-24 15:59  資料 V-Space 悄悄話 
個中文版譯唔哂全文, 各位請睇哂全文, 唔好斷章取義。

睇完你會覺得"耐人尋味"




經一事,反一智,超低能,勁攪笑!
頂部
 





 
 
 
 
 
 
 
當前時區 GMT+8, 現在時間是 2010-9-9 15:52

 
澳門流動社區版規 - 清除 Cookies - 聯繫我們 - 澳門流動社區 CyberCTM.com - WAP
  CTM 捷徑: www.ctm.net 流動網 最新優惠 網上帳單 IDD050 JOB@CTM